Rabu, 24 April 2013

CAR DESIGN


Classroom action research is also done by a teacher on the basis of the phenomena on his/her own classroom. McNiff (1992) asserts that a classroom action research is participatory and collaborative. That is why, the researcher participated as the teacher who is teaching English through a proposed strategy. The phenomenon is usually an issue in the classroom, e.g. for MTs or SMP English teacher, he/she faces a problem on a strategy to enhance or improve the students ability in specific type of genre such as: recount text, narrative text, descriptive text, report text, and procedure text. In brief, classroom action research functions as a way, which is designed to enhance the quality of both result and process of the teaching and learning due to satisfactory condition that takes place in the classroom.
There are various kinds of classroom action research models. I would like to describe the model of Kemmis and McTaggart (1992). In implementing this model, the following visualization is presented:
Classroom Action Research in teaching English Research
The Design of Classroom Action Research
The model consists of four steps: (1) planning of the action, (2) implementing of the action, (3) observing of the action, and (4) making analysis and reflection. This advantage of this model is that within the model, a new cycle covering those above stages can be re-implemented if satisfactory results of the teaching and learning process are not achieved.

Selasa, 23 April 2013


LLT.jpg (6325 bytes)
ARTICLES for TEACHERS
The following  Questions are explored in this article: What are tasks? What is the role of a focus on form in language learning tasks? Where do tasks come from? What is the relationship between communicative tasks in the world outside the classroom and pedagogical tasks? What is the relationship between tasks and language focused exercises?
One contributor to the American Dialect Society discussion on the issue summed matters up thus: “The high school sophomore who is ready to ponder the ambiguities of a possessive case noun serving as an antecedent does not exist”. That goes for most of us.  This article discusses the ambiguities of the English language and questions that grammarians can ponder and reflect on.
If a student is able to perform in a problem solving situation, a meaningful learning should then occur because he has constructed an interpretation of how things work using preexisting structures. This is the theory behind Constructivism. By creating a personal interpretation of external ideas and experiences, constructivism allows students the ability to understand how ideas can relate to each other and preexisting knowledge (Janet Drapikowski, personal communication). The articles expand on this philosophy.
This article discusses ways on how to integrate language teaching with social responsibility and global issues, such as poverty, terorism, sexuality, globalization and environmental change. Teachers should be open and accepting of different opinions, but also should recognise that that their own beliefs might be controversial in the eyes of others and therefore should give “equal time” to a treatment of those issues as well.  In fact, one of the guidelines for dealing with controversial issues in the classroom mentioned was that as teachers, we are responsible for creating an atmosphere of respect for each other’s opinions, beliefs and cultural diversity and all ideas are welcome.
Teachers could then open themselves up to new practices honestly.  Surely they would be more willing to do so when the pressure on them to perform and conform to someone else’s preconceived notions were taken away.   When such pressures are eased, they can spend time on teaching students to be learners rather than just recipients of dispensed knowledge.  When students have learnt to be learners, they too will see the benefits of those activities they now resist.   Only then will they be truly empowered.
This article gives a sample questionnaire with three relevant sections in identifying characteristics of language learners:Part One:    Background and previous knowledge;Part Two:    Language learning strategies;Part Three:  Feelings and motivation.
This paper suggests that the (language) teacher has an important role as learning-physician in the classroom, helping students to identify their cognitive and affective ailments, and suggesting courses of treatment. In view of the destructive potential of modern society, and the humanistic learning goals espoused by official government policy documents, this paper also proposes that the teacher is an agent of social change, and has a responsibility to model society in the classroom, and to promote an ethical learning curriculum in addition to cognitive and affective ones.
This paper articles explore some of the social and technological changes that  we are predicted to experience into the next century and how these may bear on the practice of language teaching.  These   includes, for example, the increasing effects of so-called "McDonaldisation", processes of 'de-skilling' and 're-skilling', the displacement of national boundaries in favour of 'globalisation' and 'globalisation', and new forms of literacy.
This article give pragmatic ways of implementing Neuro-Linguistic Programming hereinafter referred to as NLP in language learning and teaching.  If you listen to what people are saying, you’ll discover exactly how they’re processing their thoughts.  Some of us think best in pictures (visual), some of us in sounds (auditory), and some of us like to process our thoughts through our bodies (kinaesthetic: remembering that the kinema showed moving pictures makes this piece of jargon  easy).  Visual people think very fast - they need to keep up with their pictures; while, at the other extreme, kinaesthetic people may take longer to give you an answer.  Have you ever asked a question of a teenager deep in his or her feelings, and got no response?  Next time, wait a bit and you’ll get an answer: it takes time to process thoughts through every muscle.
This article is discusses the gap between research findings and classroom practice and gives ideas on how to enable teachers to identify the sources and manifestations of their students’ Foreign Language Anxiety (FLA). This text is also aimed at helping teachers to find suitable ways of handling this educational problem within the limits of their classrooms. 
There is no ‘magic formula’ for sustaining motivation in learning.  As the first point in the list of ideas says, we need to experiment and take risks.  The starting point, however, needs to be to try and understand why some students are not motivated and not simply blame them for not being interested.  If we start from the assumption, which I believe is true, that all human beings in the right circumstances are naturally motivated to learn, we need to ask ourselves: where does that motivation go?
This article describes a profile of a successful language learner and identify traits that were helpful in the learning process.  Suggestions on different ways of implementing effective classroom activities that will help promote successful language learning are implied at the end of the article
Advanced learners can generally communicate well, having learnt all the basic structures of the language. However, they need to broaden their vocabulary to express themselves more clearly and appropriately in a wide range of situations. This article addresses issues face by advanced learners and suggests ways on how to promote vocabulary expansion among these learners.
This article gives sample ways of motivating students, of making language come alive. One way to achieve this is to use a powerful and effective communication tool used by great communicators and leaders through the centuries. What is that Chaucer, Shakespeare, Tolkien, Calvino, Eco, and JK Rowling have in common with Winston Churchill, Gandhi, Einstein, and Mandela? Answer: they all use the tools of metaphor, anecdote and story to explain complex messages in concrete, easy to understand, and highly memorable ways.
This article outlines the rationale for using self-assessment techniques in language teaching, learning and assessment and presents some practical ideas that illustrate the many developments taking place.
In this study, it will be shown that learner autonomy is a perennial dynamic process amenable to ‘educational interventions’ (Candy, 1991), rather than a static product, a state, which is reached once and for all. Besides, what permeates this study is the belief that ‘in order to help learners to assume greater control over their own learning it is important to help them to become aware of and identify the strategies that they already use or could potentially use’ (Holmes & Ramos, 1991, cited in James & Garrett, 1991: 198). At any rate, individual learners differ in their learning habits, interests, needs, and motivation, and develop varying degrees of independence throughout their lives (Tumposky, 1982).


Minggu, 14 April 2013


RESEARCH DESIGNS
1Basics
1.1Pilot Study
1.2Quantitative Research Design
1.3Qualitative Research Design
1.4Quantitative and Qualitative Research

 2Descriptive Research
2.1Case Study
2.2Naturalistic Observation
2.3Survey Research Design
2.4Observational Study

 3Covariance
3.1Case-Control Study
3.2Cohort Study
3.3Longitudinal Study
3.4Cross Sectional Study
3.5Correlational Study

 4Semi-Experimental
4.1Field Experiments
4.2Quasi-Experimental Design
4.3Identical Twins Study

 5Experimental
5.1Experimental Design
5.2True Experimental Design
5.3Double Blind Experiment
5.4Factorial Design

 6Review
6.1Literature Review
6.2Systematic Reviews
6.3Meta Analysis


Read more: Research Designs - How to construct an experiment or study

Jumat, 12 April 2013


Qualitative Research


Originally prepared by Professor Peter Woods.
Component now run by Dr. Nick Pratt.
© P Woods, Faculty of Education, University of Plymouth, 2006
Parts of this component were previously published by the Open University in Section 6 of its Study Guide for E835 Educational Research in Action, 1996.   We are grateful to the OU for permission to re-use this material.

Contents

  1. FEATURES OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
  2. METHODS OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
  3. QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
  4. TASKS
  5. FURTHER READING
  6. REFERENCES



1. Features of Qualitative Research

There is a wide range of approaches to qualitative research. Atkinson et al (1998), for example, outline seven different approaches used in British educational research deriving from symbolic interactionism, anthropology, sociolinguistics, ethnomethodology, qualitative evaluation, neo-Marxist ethnography, and feminism. In addition, a number of terms are often used interchangeably, such as 'ethnography', 'case study', 'qualitative research', though each, in fact, has its own particular meaning (Click here to visit the section on Qualitative Approaches in The Research Methods Knowledge Base). In effect, however, most qualitative approaches have:
  • a focus on natural settings;
  • an interest in meanings, perspectives and understandings;
  • an emphasis on process;
  • a concern with inductive analysis and grounded theory.
[Component leader's note: It is worth noting that I now tend to use the term 'interpretive research' to avoid confusion between the notion of 'qualitative data' (data which is qualitative in nature) and a 'qualitative stance' to research (which describes a paradigmatic position. You can read more about this disctinction in the beginning research component.]

quasi-experimental study is a type of evaluation which aims to determine whether a program or intervention has the intended effect on a study’s participants. Quasi-experimental studies take on many forms, but may best be defined as lacking key components of a true experiment. While a true experiment includes (1) pre-post test design, (2) a treatment group and a control group, and (3) random assignment of study participants, quasi-experimental studies lack one or more of these design elements.
Since the most common form of a quasi-experimental study includes a pre-post test design with both a treatment group and a control group, quasi-experimental studies are often an impact evaluation that assigns members to the treatment group and control group by a method other than random assignment. Because of the danger that the treatment and control group may differ at the outset, researchers conducting quasi-experimental studies attempt to address this in a number of other ways (e.g., by matching treatment groups to like control groups or by controlling for these differences in analyses). This section focuses on two forms of quasi-experimental studies: a pre-post test design study without a control group and a pre-post test design with a control group

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE TEACHER TALK AT EYL
CLASSROOM
Liani Setiawati
SMPK 1 BPK Penabur Bandung
email: liani_stwt@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract: The use of constructive teacher talk (TT) is very important and effective in
scaffolding young learners to improve their skill in target language. Nevertheless, there is
an argument that too much teacher talk can even decrease students‟ motivation. The
present study tries to reveal the suitable amount and the students‟ perception of teacher
talk. Apart from that, there is an attempt to find out the features of teacher talk, the
frequency of either display and referential questions or teachers‟ assessments and ways in
giving feedback. This descriptive study is conducted to find out how teachers make use of
their teacher talk naturally in classroom settings. To gain deeper insight and
understanding, both qualitative and quantitative research design were employed. The
qualitative data were obtained through direct observation and teachers – students‟
interview. Moreover, the teachers – students‟ questionnaire, video recording and field
notes also added significant value towards the findings of this study. Quantitative data, on
the other hand, were gained from the calculation of students‟ questionnaire scores which
are represented in percentage. Both qualitative and quantitative data were coded,
categorized, interpreted, descriptively described and finally displayed in the form of
tables. The research findings show that despite the teacher talk‟s capability to be good
model for young learners, most students found the class more motivating, interesting, and
challenging when the teachers minimized their teacher talk and made use not only more
constructive teacher talk but also interesting activities. In conclusion, since teacher talk
serves not only as a medium to achieve young learners‟s learning objectives but also as a
tool to build better dynamic interaction between teacher and students in classroom
settings, it is advisable for all EFL teachers to improve their effective constructive talk
towards their students.
Key words: SLA, TT (Teacher Talk), TTT (Teacher Talk Time), discourse Analysis,
code switching, conversational analysis, ST (Students Talk) , STT (Student Talk Time)

What Is Descriptive Research?

Descriptive research does not fit neatly into the definition of either quantitative or qualitative research methodologies, but instead it can utilize elements of both, often within the same study. The term descriptive research refers to the type of research question, design, and data analysis that will be applied to a given topic. Descriptive statistics tell what is, while inferential statistics try to determine cause and effect.
The type of question asked by the researcher will ultimately determine the type of approach necessary to complete an accurate assessment of the topic at hand. Descriptive studies, primarily concerned with finding out "what is," might be applied to investigate the following questions: Do teachers hold favorable attitudes toward using computers in schools? What kinds of activities that involve technology occur in sixth-grade classrooms and how frequently do they occur? What have been the reactions of school administrators to technological innovations in teaching the social sciences? How have high school computing courses changed over the last 10 years? How do the new multimediated textbooks compare to the print-based textbooks? How are decisions being made about using Channel One in schools, and for those schools that choose to use it, how is Channel One being implemented? What is the best way to provide access to computer equipment in schools? How should instructional designers improve software design to make the software more appealing to students? To what degree are special-education teachers well versed concerning assistive technology? Is there a relationship between experience with multimedia computers and problem-solving skills? How successful is a certain satellite-delivered Spanish course in terms of motivational value and academic achievement? Do teachers actually implement technology in the way they perceive? How many people use the AECT gopher server, and what do they use if for?
Descriptive research can be either quantitative or qualitative. It can involve collections of quantitative information that can be tabulated along a continuum in numerical form, such as scores on a test or the number of times a person chooses to use a-certain feature of a multimedia program, or it can describe categories of information such as gender or patterns of interaction when using technology in a group situation. Descriptive research involves gathering data that describe events and then organizes, tabulates, depicts, and describes the data collection (Glass & Hopkins, 1984). It often uses visual aids such as graphs and charts to aid the reader in understanding the data distribution. Because the human mind cannot extract the full import of a large mass of raw data, descriptive statistics are very important in reducing the data to manageable form. When in-depth, narrative descriptions of small numbers of cases are involved, the research uses description as a tool to organize data into patterns that emerge during analysis. Those patterns aid the mind in comprehending a qualitative study and its implications.

The Design of Classroom Action Research in Teaching English Research

Nowadays, in teaching English, a teacher usually makes and needs development and empowerment into his class. One way to improve the quality of the teaching English process is to do Classroom Action Research (CAR). The term “classroom action research” is very familiar with English teachers, particularly professional or certified teachers. In doing it, the teacher also functions as a researcher because it involves teachers inside the classroom rather than being carried out solely by specialists from outside the classroom (Phillips & Carr, 2010). From this way, it is well-known for teacher-researcher.
The Classroom Action Research is a part of various kinds of action research out of some other themes like participatory research, critical action research, and action learning (Phillips & Carr, 2010). Considering this, the following explanation starts from presenting definition of action research and then goes to the detailed explanation about the Classroom Action Research.According to Koshy (2005) & Bassey (1998) action research is an enquiry which is carried out in order to understand, evaluate and then modify educational program in order to improve educational practice. Koshy (2005), furthermore, states that an important characteristics of action research is that it proposes opportunities for collaborative work.
In addition, Mills (2003) says that action research is any systematic inquiry conducted by teacher researchers, principals, school counselors, or other stakeholders in the teaching and learning environment to gather information about how their particular schools operate, how they teach, and how well their students learn.
The explanation above implies that one of the proposed designs of action research is Classroom Action Research involving a teacher in the classroom to empower and develop the quality of the classroom process. The design of classroom action research based on the consideration that the researcher attempts to solve the problem of the particular classroom. It provides a way of thinking systematically about what happens in the school or classroom, implementing critically informed action where improvements are thought to be possible (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1992).
Snell (1999) states that action study is concerned with trying to improve one specific point in a teacher’s technique in a particular classroom using empirical measurement. Additionally, Kasbollah & Sukarnyana (1988) states classroom action research is a reflective research conducted by giving a certain action to improve an unsatisfactory condition and increase the quality of teaching practices in the classroom in order that those practices become more professional. In short, a classroom action research focuses on a particular classroom problem or a group of students and aims at helping the teacher solve the problems in finding an appropriate technique in teaching.
Classroom action research is also done by a teacher on the basis of the phenomena on his/her own classroom. McNiff (1992) asserts that a classroom action research is participatory and collaborative. That is why, the researcher participated as the teacher who is teaching English through a proposed strategy. The phenomenon is usually an issue in the classroom, e.g. for MTs or SMP English teacher, he/she faces a problem on a strategy to enhance or improve the students ability in specific type of genre such as: recount text, narrative text, descriptive text, report text, and procedure text. In brief, classroom action research functions as a way, which is designed to enhance the quality of both result and process of the teaching and learning due to satisfactory condition that takes place in the classroom.
There are various kinds of classroom action research models. I would like to describe the model of Kemmis and McTaggart (1992). In implementing this model, the following visualization is presented:
Classroom Action Research in teaching English Research
The Design of Classroom Action Research
The model consists of four steps: (1) planning of the action, (2) implementing of the action, (3) observing of the action, and (4) making analysis and reflection. This advantage of this model is that within the model, a new cycle covering those above stages can be re-implemented if satisfactory results of the teaching and learning process are not achieved.
References
Bassey, M. 1998. Action Research for Improving Practice. In R. Halsall. (Ed.). Teacher Research & School Improvement: Opening Doors from the Inside, (93). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Kasbollah, K.E.S. & Sukarnyana, W.I. 1988. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Malang: Penerbit Universitas Negeri Malang.
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. 1992. The Action Research Planner. Victoria: Deaken University Press.
Koshy, V. 2005. Action Research for Improving Practice: A Practical Guide. Great Britain: TJ International Ltd.
McNiff, J. 1992. Action Research: Principle and Practice. New York: Routledge.
Mills, G.E. 2003. Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher. (2nd Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Phillips, D.A. & Carr, K. 2010. Becoming A Teacher through Action Research. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Snell, J. 1999. Improving Teacher-Student Interaction in the EFL Classroom: An Action Research Report. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4. (Online) (http://iteslj.org)